sybil/examples/factorial.sy

[ :x x x ] :dup

# This a dumb little workaround to allow for recursion so factorial inside of
# the function definition will look in the correct scope
0 :factorial
[
    dup!
    [dup! 1 -! factorial! *!]
    [:_ 1]
    if!
]
:factorial

[
    dup! print!
    "! = " print!
    factorial!
    println!
]
:do-factorial

1 do-factorial!
2 do-factorial!
3 do-factorial!
4 do-factorial!
5 do-factorial!
6 do-factorial!
7 do-factorial!
8 do-factorial!
9 do-factorial!
Change `if` function stack ordering, add some basic math ops to Int, add factorial example * `if` function stack ordering is changed to use condition, if-false, if-true (bottom to top). This is so we can pass a value on top of the stack directly to a new `if` in a condition, so we don't have to store a new value in a new variable. * Add __splat__ and __minus__ functions to Int * Add * and - builtins, which call the __splat__ and __minus__ functions of the top stack item, respectively. * Add factorial example because now factorials are possible with this skeleton implementation, albeit a little hacky with the recursion. Signed-off-by: Alek Ratzloff <alekratz@gmail.com> 2022-02-11 11:10:14 -08:00			`[ :x x x ] :dup`

Add comment processing, add a comment to factorial.sy to test it out Signed-off-by: Alek Ratzloff <alekratz@gmail.com> 2022-02-11 18:31:12 -08:00			`# This a dumb little workaround to allow for recursion so factorial inside of`
			`# the function definition will look in the correct scope`
Change `if` function stack ordering, add some basic math ops to Int, add factorial example * `if` function stack ordering is changed to use condition, if-false, if-true (bottom to top). This is so we can pass a value on top of the stack directly to a new `if` in a condition, so we don't have to store a new value in a new variable. * Add __splat__ and __minus__ functions to Int * Add * and - builtins, which call the __splat__ and __minus__ functions of the top stack item, respectively. * Add factorial example because now factorials are possible with this skeleton implementation, albeit a little hacky with the recursion. Signed-off-by: Alek Ratzloff <alekratz@gmail.com> 2022-02-11 11:10:14 -08:00			`0 :factorial`
			`[`
			`dup!`
			`[dup! 1 -! factorial! *!]`
			`[:_ 1]`
			`if!`
			`]`
			`:factorial`

			`[`
			`dup! print!`
			`"! = " print!`
			`factorial!`
			`println!`
			`]`
			`:do-factorial`

			`1 do-factorial!`
			`2 do-factorial!`
			`3 do-factorial!`
			`4 do-factorial!`
			`5 do-factorial!`
			`6 do-factorial!`
			`7 do-factorial!`
			`8 do-factorial!`
			`9 do-factorial!`